🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I usually shied away from extensive use of luck during my Dungeons & Dragons games. I preferred was for the plot and session development to be determined by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. That said, I opted to change my approach, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known podcast features a DM who frequently requests "luck rolls" from the players. The process entails choosing a polyhedral and assigning potential outcomes tied to the result. It's at its core no different from using a pre-generated chart, these are devised spontaneously when a course of events has no clear conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own game, mostly because it appeared novel and offered a break from my usual habits. The experience were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the perennial tension between pre-determination and improvisation in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Story Beat

In a recent session, my party had concluded a city-wide conflict. Later, a player asked about two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. Instead of picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I asked the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, only one succumbed; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a profoundly moving scene where the party came upon the corpses of their allies, forever united in death. The party performed a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to previous story developments. In a concluding gesture, I decided that the forms were strangely transformed, revealing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's magical effect was perfectly what the group lacked to address another major story problem. You simply script this type of magical coincidences.

Honing DM Agility

This event made me wonder if randomization and spontaneity are actually the beating heart of this game. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Players frequently take delight in upending the most detailed plans. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and invent scenarios on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a excellent way to develop these skills without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The trick is to apply them for minor circumstances that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. As an example, I wouldn't use it to establish if the central plot figure is a traitor. But, I could use it to determine if the PCs enter a room just in time to see a major incident takes place.

Strengthening Player Agency

Spontaneous randomization also serves to keep players engaged and create the impression that the adventure is alive, evolving according to their choices as they play. It combats the feeling that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole story, thereby enhancing the cooperative aspect of the game.

This philosophy has long been part of the original design. Early editions were reliant on encounter generators, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Even though current D&D often emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the only path.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. However, there is also no issue with letting go and permitting the dice to decide some things in place of you. Direction is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We need it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to release it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final recommendation is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Try a little randomness for minor details. You might just create that the unexpected outcome is significantly more memorable than anything you might have scripted on your own.